Saturday, 17 February 2007
Guest Elderblogger: Mick Brady
[EDITOR'S NOTE: While I am away for a few days, five fantastic elders agreed to guest blog here at Time Goes By. Mick Brady blogs at Dancing in Tongues and at The Blog Brothers with his – well, brother, of course. His story here, which he titles, A Portrait of the Artist as a Free Man, is one all of us can happily heed. Please welcome Mick with plenty of kudos and comments.]
Not to paint too bleak a picture, so to speak, but the reality is that it takes a great deal of talent, perseverance, business savvy, a bit of luck and a willingness to toil in relative obscurity for long periods of time with little or no reward, in order to become a "successful" artist, American style.
Even then, assuming you meet all the requirements, the odds are slim that you'll become a star. In fact, they're roughly about the same as any kid shooting hoops in The Bronx, who's dreaming of becoming a starter in the NBA. But then, there are hoop dreams, and there are art dreams, and no shortage of dreamers to dream them.
The problem for many of these dreamers, both young and old, is that fame and fortune seems to be the sole measure of success. When it doesn't turn out that way, bitterness and disillusionment often set in and many find it hard to make the adjustment. The choice then becomes one of either throwing more time and energy into what looks like a losing proposition, or cutting one's losses and moving on to new horizons.
It's a tough place to be. Imagine you had chosen a medical career and after years of training and hardship you discover that they're only hiring a dozen doctors. Instead of doing brain surgery, you wind up flipping hamburgers.
As an artist myself, I have many friends who've had to make that decision. Some have started over and found new careers. Some, a fortunate few, found safety in academia where there is ample time to create. And some of the more determined are waiting on tables or mowing lawns to this day, still waiting to be discovered.
Some feel they've been cheated and look back bitterly on their lives as having been wasted on an empty quest. A select few have actually made it in New York, but even they are not all that happy, either.
My own art career has gone through almost all of the above except the part about making it in New York. I did attempt it as a young man, though, back in the 60s, but after a few tumultuous years, returned home to become a designer and illustrator. I had a family to support and bohemia just wasn't going to cut it.
This then led to a career as a college professor and the chance to return to fine art. Following a number of successful shows, I began experimenting with the computer and after accepting an early retirement and moving to Santa Barbara, I began showing my new digital paintings.
Attempt Number Three is still a work still in progress and I've been trying to remain optimistic. I recently fired my agent in New York.
A few weeks ago, however, my wife, who teaches at the Santa Barbara City College, forwarded an email to me which she had received from the director of the school art gallery. It was an announcement of an exhibit that was to open that week, entitled The Brothers Pedersen: Modern Masters. I had never heard of them, but then I had not spent much time exploring the art scene here in California. I think I'm still a bit of an art snob, being from New York.
Lately it seems, perhaps as a result of my own growing disappointment, I have tended to avoid art openings whenever possible, but something in the text caught my eye: “Aage and Jens Pedersen have a combined total of nearly 140 years of making art”, and this was to be “their first two-person show together.”
Even more intriguing were the accompanying photos: there they were, side by side, the two brothers - warm, open faces, bright eyes filled with merriment and most incredibly, they were smiling! Openly. Joyously. In a New York minute, my cool postmodernist bubble had burst. I had to meet these guys.
No sooner had we arrived at the gallery that evening, when Jens caught my eye and walked over with an extended hand and a broad smile to greet us. "Hello. How do you do? Glad you could come. My name is Jens." Now, this was something I had never experienced before, either in New York or in L.A - the artist reaching out to greet his audience.
He then introduced us to his brother and the four of us spent the next half hour or so, with a few interruptions, chattering on excitedly about their work, their lives, and their history. Most fun I've had in an art gallery in a long, long time.
Originally from Denmark, Jens, 89, and his brother Aage, 86, had been making art since they were children. Their uncle, a professor at the Royal Academy of Art in Copenhagen, had seen to it that their house was filled with paintings and music, and all of this seemed to mesmerize the two young boys. Paintings won out over music, and they would later wind up studying at that same Academy themselves.
They probably would have gone on to experience certain success in their own country were it not for the German occupation of Denmark, which forced them and their fellow countrymen to endure five long years of fear, hardship and suffering. Not long after the war ended, they sailed for America.
Although well aware that New York at that time was on its way to becoming the center of gravity for artists, they wisely decided to move on to California, where relatives from their native country had already settled. They soon learned that shockwaves had already arrived from the east, created by painters like Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning and Franz Kline, and they soon joined in the excitement, taking up the banner of modernist abstraction in their own work. They have never looked back.
Along the way, they both worked at other jobs to sustain themselves and their families, often painting on a part-time basis. Aage had become a watchmaker, Jens worked at a variety of trades, but they never lost sight of the art at the center of it all. As Jens put it, "I've worked many jobs in life, but now I'm back to where I've always belonged, painting full time." The dream never died.
Toward the end of our conversation, I asked Jens, who is approaching 90, if it had become more difficult to work as he got older. He looked at me with bemused puzzlement.
“More difficult? Yes, in this sense: It becomes more difficult each day to stay and finish my breakfast before rushing into my studio to work. I have more ideas than ever, they become more exciting each day, and my wife insists that I finish my breakfast before I start working. So, yes, it becomes more difficult." His wife, standing next to us, confirmed this, with a loving smile.
He then added, "If you're not doing this for the pure joy of doing it, then there is no reason to do it. You should find something else to do." I then understood the smiles, the twinkle in the eyes, the warm welcome. They were not interested in the fame or the fortune, they didn't need the recognition. They were true creators. They had never lost the excitement that they had felt as children when squishing paint between their fingers and smearing it all over that big sheet of paper. They were painting for the sheer joy of it, and by the looks of things, they may go on doing it for another 140 years.
Let's see, I'll be 65 in June. By my new way of reckoning, I have at least 25 more years of pure exultation ahead of me. Maybe even more, if I can just keep everything in perspective.
From the Artists' Catalog:
”Theirs is not cool, theory-driven painting but a passionate, lyric exploration. Historically, they seem more influenced by Wassily Kandinsky's spiritual-based attitude than Marcel Duchamp and his conceptual followers. The Pedersen brothers, known as artists' artists, are widely admired and respected in the Santa Barbara art community. They are true masters of their craft and are inspirations to all who come to know them and their work.”
Posted by Ronni Bennett at 05:30 AM | Permalink | Email this post
Comments
One of your early statements immediately caught my eye with regard to having your talent overwhelmed with life in general or commercialization specifically. I myself recently expounded to some degree about talent and the influence that commercialization and the public can have on an artist and his creations. I am of a strong belief that if your initial goal in an artistic endeavor is to find fame and fortune, you have compromised what ever talent you may have possessed right from the start.
I am sixty-five and have just recently discovered a new passion for a particular artistic endeavor. But because I have been associated with the “arts” (and I use that term quite loosely) for most of my life, the wisdom of those years is brought to bear on this new endeavor. I do not, under any condition, want to find myself succumbing to the likes and dislikes of others. I put something down on the paper and after looking at it and saying, “Yes, that is it!” It is then that I have satisfied my passion and vision. But then moments, hours, or even days later you find yourself looking at it and then beginning to wonder if others will like it. That is when the compromising process has its beginning. And that is when you have to get up out of your chair and yell, “NO!” and walk away leaving your passion and vision intact. If you don’t, your next endeavor will be influenced even before it is completed.
Even as we speak I toil with the decision as to whether to have a website for displaying my new endeavors. Certainly it seems for the most part logical to do so but there is a tremendous down side to that proposition. It is not a matter of dealing with criticism but a matter of staying true to your passion. For any art form outside influences are very difficult to deal with because I think most artists, regardless of their mediums, let that influence in what ever form, good or bad, ultimately influence their work. And if you put your work out there, the public certainly has the right to comment, whether positively or negatively.
Artists, young and old alike, certainly have an obligation to clothe and feed themselves but it is sad when one sacrifices his talent in that process. I do personally feel however, that in the majority of these circumstances the mindset of the artist was perhaps solely focused on the commercial aspect from the beginning. Sometimes life is such that we have but small cracks left where we can squeeze in a moment here or moment there to get in touch with those artistic passions. A true talent will always manage….their soul and passion will not let them do otherwise…..even if it takes years including getting the kids grown-up and out on their own.
What is really great about all this now from my standpoint is that I have reached the “golden years” and have retired. I am independent now and I really have no commercial aspirations whatsoever. So that leaves what ever talent I do possess complete freedom. My passions can literally run amuck! Part of what Ronni’s blog is about, as you are well aware, is the fact that at this point in our life it is not time to roll over and play dead. It is rather a time to be true to ourselves and participate in life to our fullest.
Posted by: Alan G on Feb 17, 2007 9:10:52 AM
Thank you for a most inspiring and inspiriting start to the weekend.
I get shivers of joy reading about the Pedersen brothers. I can't wait to learn more about their work. Except first I need to grab my sketchbook and do some drawing! (I've had my breakfast...)
And Alan, if you are considering sharing your work on line, please do! As someone who only began to draw and paint two years ago, I never would have grown the way I have without the virtual presence and support of my blog visitors. As it is, I've been moved by how generous and supportive people are online as I post a new drawing or painting every day. I think people recognize the creative and emotional risks taken in such openness. In 780 days of posting work now, I have had one negative/snarky comment. Spam, yes, of course, but only one negative voice to hundreds of welcoming ones. If your vision of your work permits sharing it with an audience at this point - please, please, come on in, the water's fine!
Posted by: Elizabeth Perry on Feb 17, 2007 9:57:57 AM
Mick: thanks for this wonderfully uplifting article. Haven't enjoyed anything so much in a long while. I'll have a better day because of you. Thanks. Dee
Posted by: Dee on Feb 17, 2007 10:17:28 AM
"If you're not doing this for the pure joy of doing it, then there is no reason to do it." Thank you, Mick, for this inspiring post, for the confirmation of something I've long believed in, but sometimes struggle with in the busy-ness of living. Wonderful comments too.
Posted by: marja-leena on Feb 17, 2007 12:38:15 PM
What a marvelous way to start a Saturday! Thank you so very much.
Posted by: Susan on Feb 17, 2007 1:10:32 PM
Thanks for this. I'm just starting Julia Cameron's "Finding Water: The Art of Perseverance" this week with a group of artists and bloggers, and I'm going to link to this from my blog and post it as a comment on the Finding Water blog. Which is here if anyone is interested:
Posted by: donna on Feb 17, 2007 1:58:25 PM
awesome, awesome and so inspirting! thank you for sharing their stories here!
Posted by: leah on Feb 17, 2007 3:05:47 PM
That was great. I have mostly struggled with my oil painting. I enjoy it but it never matches that internal eye, but I have a friend who paints with that kind of joy. The more she paints, the happier she is. It is a blessing to have that view toward what you do.
Posted by: Rain on Feb 17, 2007 6:25:20 PM
It is such a hoot to see people in their 80's still finding joy in their work. That is such a gift.
Posted by: AlwaysQuestion on Feb 17, 2007 8:36:37 PM
I've enjoyed reading your blog and commentary here. Your words and stories are often works of art themselves, as are your brother's.
I admire how these artists are deriving their reward from their endeavors throughout their lives, that seeking fame is not a primary driving force. Believing in oneself when doubts arise, embracing hope that others may appreciate an artistic endeavor, and perseverance that allows the artist to know he/she tried, did their best, must surely provide an inner satisfaction unparalleled. Sometimes that is all to which we can cling.
Fortunate are those who are able to devote their lives to only their art, but how realistic is that expectation for many? Perhaps the artist and the artist's work is more informed from a more rounded life, spending time in the whole world and with daily living.
We tend to assume "if only... how much better I would have been," or "how much more I could have accomplished." We frequently never consider the possiblity we might have been worse, or done less, simply by virtue of how we might have led our life, if for no other reason.
Posted by: Joared on Feb 17, 2007 9:14:26 PM
the easiest way out of 60's artist addiction, was to spend a year near Danang.
Posted by: bill tiger on Feb 18, 2007 3:03:18 AM
Such a beautifully constructed piece of writing this, offering a memory, a narrative, images and a message (I hesitate to say 'moral').
The persistence of talented people in their work is wonderful, and even more wonderful is that of those who persist without much talent at all.
Posted by: Anna on Feb 18, 2007 5:36:08 AM
bouyed me up to read this. loved your move from a certain darkness to light as you opened up to these two elder artists. delightful writing and thinking. perhaps its more likely that you'd meet artists like jens and aage far from the youth-driven hustle of new york.
naomi, public artist, nyc
Posted by: naomi dagen bloom on Feb 18, 2007 8:21:54 AM
I have 'met' many people on flickr, who have discovered making art in their latter years. Of course we all know about Grandma Moses, but there seem to be many people out there who ar ehappily creating and not letting their age or in many cases their lack of formal training get in the way.
I'm 60 and over the last 2 - 3 years have been working away solidly making digital images. I won't say that recognition os immaterial, but the process of creativity is what drives me, not the need for the output to be recognised by others.
Posted by: ian on Feb 18, 2007 8:25:59 AM
Very inspiring and well -written. At the end I laughed... the previous post was written by Frank Paynter.
Two painter posts back to back.
Posted by: MotherPie on Feb 18, 2007 9:23:35 AM
Wonderful blog--great comments too.Nonetheless,art has always been a businees.I a museum docent and a collector---over 300 paintings,mostly pre 1900.I have acquired many exceptional works many unsigned,or signed by unknowns.No doubt,these talented artists would have created many more if they had good agents,or could spend more time on art.
Posted by: oscar on Feb 18, 2007 2:22:57 PM
What a truly fascinating post. I thoroughly enjoyed reading such a well written blog. I agree with those who found this uplifting and rewarding. It makes me want to meet Jens and Aage to see if some of their enthusiasm might rub off on me. Joy shared is joy multiplied. Thanks, Mick Brady, for a great Sunday (when it arrives on my computer),
Posted by: Darlene Costner on Feb 18, 2007 2:32:03 PM
Thank you for all the warm and wonderful comments; I feel as though I've just made a bunch of new friends over here at TGB.
As I noted on my own website regarding this conversation, many of your remarks have been just as uplifting as the original post, and I suspect we might be able to trace at least some of those feelings back to that twinkle in the eyes of the Pedersen boys; so, them, I lift a glass of pinot noir.
And thanks, Ronni, for the opportunity to borrow your microphone. It was great fun.
Posted by: on Feb 18, 2007 4:43:26 PM
He forgot to include his name: the comment directly above this one is from the author of this guest blog, Mick Brady.
Posted by: Ronni Bennett on Feb 18, 2007 5:23:48 PM
And yet another thanks, Ronni.
Posted by: Mick on Feb 18, 2007 6:09:34 PM
Great!!!!!!!!!! This inspired me greatly! Since the women in my family seem to live long, I'm probably destined to be around for a while. That those years can be filled with productivity and creativity sounds pretty good to me! So what am I waiting for? Thanks for sharing, Mick!!!
Posted by: Kay Dennison on Feb 18, 2007 11:50:18 PM








