Tuesday, 04 March 2008
Today’s Primary
UPDATE: In a Wall Street Journal story earlier this week, Republican presidential candidate John McCain said that as president, he would "seek to implement private [Social Security] savings accounts...along the lines that President Bush proposed.” More at Campaign For America's Future.]
Item: Crabby Old Lady has heard hardly a word about Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain for the past week. Instead, the anchors and pundits and columnists and prognosticators have traded shots on whether Senator Hillary Clinton should drop out of the Democratic primary if she does not win both Ohio and Texas today.
Or, whether she should drop out if she wins only one. Or if she wins both, but by slim margins. Or – well, Crabby can’t remember the other options now, but all have been presented as being “for the good of the party” and there’s damned little commentary on what the good of the country might be. It’s all horse race and no substance.
Item: For the entire year of 2005, Crabby spent a great deal of time researching Social Security and reporting (through 24 posts) all the reasons she and others she quoted believed that President Bush’s Social Security privatization proposal was a bad idea.
The president wanted to allow workers to invest two percent or four percent or more of their Social Security contributions in stocks which, according to Mr. Bush, would make everyone millionaires by the time they retired. It was as though the president and his Social Security plan supporters had never heard of recession.
Apparently, a large majority of the country HAD heard of recession and the proposal never made it Congress. Crabby doesn’t like being an old I-told-you-so, but here we are in 2008, with the stock market dropping daily like temperatures in a Maine winter.
Item: In 2006, President Bush tried to resurrect his Social Security privatization plan. It lasted about one news cycle and disappeared, but Crabby made note of one report suggesting that the plan might succeed if Senator Clinton were to be elected president:
“[Senator Clinton’s] husband was considering pushing for legislation that would have put 2 percentage points of payroll taxes into a private account system, [economist Dean] Baker says. But his affair with an intern blocked any decision.”
- The Christian Science Monitor, 8 May 2006
[Crabby cannot link to the newspaper’s story; it is now behind a firewall.]
There are four things to know about the idea that Senator Clinton, as president, might try to privatize Social Security:
- She doesn’t necessarily agree with her husband on all policies
- Senator Barack Obama (and Senator Clinton), as far as Crabby knows, hasn’t said anything about Social Security privatization during this campaign
- Campaign rhetoric has little to do with actual practice once a candidate is elected
- Anything that benefits corporations over citizens (which Social Security privatization would do in the billions of dollars) will be tried one way or another
Elder issues have not been addressed (yet) in this year’s campaign, but Crabby keeps thinking about that Christian Science Monitor story and about how Social Security privatization would impoverish future elders. Even with her four points above, Crabby wouldn’t be disturbed if Senator Clinton drops out of the campaign after today.
[At The Elder Storytelling Place today, Grannymar recalls a terrorist attack from half a century ago at an Irish hotel named La Mon and how the community overcame it.]
Posted by Crabby Old Lady at 05:57 AM | Permalink | Email this post
Comments
I, too, have thought about the stock market investments hoopla given the vagaries of said market. Your four points are well-taken though I am less certain than you about point four, or at least the degree to which it might be done. On the other hand, given the track record of our Congress we can count on the fact they won't be looking after our interests.
I'm more than a little sick of the flapping going on between Obama and Hillary. I want more substance about the specific issues that matter including Socal Security remedies, healthcare and other issues we've explored here.
Our Fourth Estate continues to ill-serve us when we most need them. Thank heavens for blogs and the Internet.
Posted by: joared on Mar 4, 2008 7:01:45 AM
I agree with Joared about the Fourth Estate. I blame the news media for much of the lack of specifics. If the candidates make a specific proposal about anything, it becomes red meat to the TV commentators and they will tear it apart.
This forces the candidates to be very careful because the talking heads will pounce on any specific proposal and magnify it out of all proportion as to what was actually said.
The drama of the horse race is blown up as news worthy and everyone in the press obsess on that one thing like a bunch of stupid parrots. (My apologies to a Parrot.)
Posted by: Darlene on Mar 4, 2008 8:45:46 AM
Voters are swung this way or that by so many things, like appearances on Saturday Night Live or the Daily Show, or sympathy for a possible losing candidate, that I have very little faith in them voting based on the issues. It's like a wind blows through and no matter what they knew, they go oh my and vote differently than their own interests. I can't believe how many still buy as truth those emails that bombard us with lies. So good people say-- well he's a Muslim and I don't know how I feel about that. It's hard to know how it'll go tonight but it won't surprise me if Hillary wins based on that wind blowing through that sways the easily swayed. Can you imagine voting for someone for the most important office in this country because you feel sorry for them? It's hard to imagine but some do, I guess.
Posted by: Rain on Mar 4, 2008 9:26:18 AM
"Senator Barack Obama ... as far as Crabby knows, hasn’t said anything about Social Security privatization during this campaign"
Crabby:
Senator Obama has presented his ideas on social security and other senior issues in considerable detail at his website,
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/socialsecurity/
To quote from there, "Obama is strongly opposed to privatizing Social Security." (I think that's pretty unequivocal.) And before the campaign began, in a speech at the National Press Club in 2005 he argued strongly against privatization. While making several proposals for ways to strengthen the system, he appears to stress two in particular: raising the payroll tax maximum from its present $97,500 and making it easier, cheaper and more automatic for people to save through legislative initiatives like the Save More for Retirement Act.
Speaking of the media, one of Obama's ideas that I believe deserves more attention is his proposal to eliminate all income taxation for seniors making less than $50,000 a year. McCain wants to make permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and it gets headlines, but proposing a tax cut for seniors barely registers. Go figure.
Posted by: Deejay on Mar 4, 2008 9:34:03 AM
Thank you, Deejay. Crabby was too lazy, writing at 5AM this morning, to look up candidate's Social Security positions and was relying on memory of what she's read and heard.
She knows better, and appreciates your update.
Posted by: Crabby Old Lady on Mar 4, 2008 9:55:10 AM
Here the Democratic duo are mentioned as having the day free, and McCain is said to be campaining today. Then again, I live in a conservative Republican town.
Posted by: Mage Bailey on Mar 4, 2008 11:22:59 AM
I'm terribly afraid that, in addition to needing to be vigilant about what might be intended re Social Security, we're about to be in for a blizzard of writing about impending doom as a consequence of Medicare cost inflation. Robert Pear had a piece in the NYT yesterday that warned:
Economists and health policy experts say the federal health programs are unsustainable in their current form, because they are growing much faster than the economy or the revenues used to finance them. The Medicare program is especially endangered; its hospital insurance trust fund is expected to run out of money in 11 years.Guess this is old people's fault for needing health care. We need to find a way to make common cause across all ages to demand solutions that aren't just about cutting costs. That will not be popular with the people who make a killing on the current system.But the need for cutbacks is not a popular theme for political candidates wooing voters who want more care at a lower cost.
Posted by: janinsanfran on Mar 4, 2008 12:19:59 PM
Crabby, keep going!!! I love your opinions, and the fact that you write about these issues. I'm at the Health 2.0 conference, and I see that most of the new health care technology initiatives are not aimed at Medicare recipients. The most innovative docs are doing online fee-for-service medicine and no longer taking insurance. To me, this is the other side of Social Security. No candidate is talking about Medicare, either. Just about younger people's health care. Not that I mind everyone having equal access:-)
Posted by: francine hardaway on Mar 4, 2008 5:16:18 PM
From where I sit, I don't see where any of the candidates are thinking about health care for any of us beyond lip service. All they really have in their alleged minds is getting elected to the presidency and the press isn't asking hard question. Courage and conviction are no longer are no longer prevalent in today's journalism.
Posted by: Kay Dennison on Mar 4, 2008 6:30:40 PM
More on candidates and health care.
Posted by: Linda on Mar 4, 2008 10:08:31 PM








