Elder Time, Energy and Scheduling
ELDER MUSIC: Some Doo-Wop

INTERESTING STUFF: Special Edition for 23 July 2011

Category_bug_interestingstuff Interesting Stuff is a weekly listing of short takes and links to web items that have caught my attention; some related to aging and some not, some useful and others just for fun.

You are all encouraged to submit items for inclusion. Just click “Contact” in the upper left corner of any Time Goes By page to send them. I'm sorry that I probably won't have time to acknowledge receipt and there is no guarantee of publication. But when I do include them, you will be credited and I will link to your blog if you have one.


UPDATE: After I finished the post below, House Speaker John Boehner on Friday, walked out of negotiations on the debt ceiling with President Barack Obama. Walked out! And then refused to return a phone call to the president! (I'll have something to say about that next week.)

The country is now in crisis.

The president has called Congressional leaders to a meeting at the White House on Saturday beginning at 11AM. I think the post below still stands.


The economic picture in the U.S. - and, by extension, the world – is so bleak at this moment that it is reasonable to ditch most of the light fare presented in the weekly Interesting Stuff for a look at where the nation is and where it soon may be.

Here are a few things (among many) that stand out for me from the past weeks of prolonged discussion in Washington of the debt ceiling. Each may seem small in itself but is representative of dozens of additional outrages indicating to me that our country is in deep trouble.

• Grover Norquist holds no public office, has no official standing anywhere. Yet, the media interviewed him repeatedly about his no-taxes-ever pledge as though it were law. All but three or four Republicans in Congress have signed the pledge and they stick to it more closely than the Constitution they are sworn to uphold.

Maybe I should write a progressive pledge and get every Democrat in Congress to sign it. Why shouldn't a pledge I write have as much force as Norquist's? He's got no more credentials than I do.

• The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was shut down last night because Congress, too busy flapping its gums over how to screw old and poor people, refused to allow airline and railroad employees to unionize.

Billions of dollars in airport construction is now halted (no pay for those workers) and the federal government will lose $200 million a week in ticket taxes.

• Congressional tea partiers – one-quarter of the House - are so stupid I doubt they can find themselves in a mirror. I heard one this week say that Obama is a Communist and he (the tea partier) will not allow the president to lead the nation into fascism.

That the guy believes Communism and fascism are the same thing is so idiotic it would be funny except he is an elected national leader. Which makes it frightening. What else is he ignorant of?

• That representative's brethren at the state level pass insane legislation allowing people to carry guns to bars where alcohol is sold.

• In many states, they have limited abortion so severely that is it unavailable at all even, in some cases, when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest and the health of the mother is at risk.

• They have enacted voter ID bills (to prevent fraud, they say) that make it all but impossible for millions of black, Latino and elder citizens to vote. Which is, of course, the real point since those groups lean strongly Democratic and if elders have not in the past, it's a good bet they'll switch parties when they see their Medicare and Social Security cut.

• The Social Security Administration announced yesterday that all offices throughout the country will henceforth close 30 minutes earlier than in the past. This is due to the $1 billion cut to the agency in this fiscal year's budget.

Thirty minutes doesn't seem like much but it is how right wing extremists operate; if they can't get what they want all at once, they are quite happy to chip away at their irrational goals a little at a time. They've been doing it for years while the rest of us weren't paying attention.

It's not just the Republicans. President Barack Obama has failed repeatedly to stand up for the people of the United States against the batshit crazy Republicans and Wall Street. Why would it be any different this time?

No one knows for certain, but the president appears to have sold out Social Security and Medicare during these debt ceiling negotiations by possibly agreeing to change the method of calculating the Social Security COLA to the chained CPI which would decrease benefits over time by nearly six percent, and raise the age of eligibility for Medicare to 67.

Today is Medicare's 46th birthday. Happy birthday, elders.

Here is what President Obama said at his Friday town hall meeting in Maryland where he continued to call for a “grand bargain” - you know, lots of cuts to safety net programs:

"This idea of balance, this idea of shared sacrifice, of a deficit plan that includes tough spending cuts but also includes tax reform that raises more revenue, this isn't just my position. This isn't just a Democratic position. This isn't some wild-eyed socialist position...”

I'm enraged every time I see or hear the phrase, “shared sacrifice.” THERE IS NO SHARED SACRIFICE. What there is, are draconian cuts for old and poor people and maybe lifting a tax loophole for corporate jets.

Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are being cut after those who need them most have already lost their life savings in the 2008 crash and following that, their homes and their jobs.

There is nothing left to take from us but, of course, our health care and the income we spent decades in the workforce paying for.

The president continued on the bogus shared sacrifice theme:

“There are cuts that some people in my own party aren't too happy about, and frankly, I wouldn't make them if money wasn't so tight,” he said.

One of the several reasons it is dangerous to cut safety net programs (or change any law) under deadline pressure (which should be obvious) is that it is easy to pass new legislation, but nearly impossible to rescind poor decisions. (e.g. Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.)

Polls consistently show that a large majority of the public want the debt ceiling raised, no changes to Social Security and to maintain the age of eligibility for Medicare where it is at 65. There is no indication that anyone in Washington is listening.

So here we are right now, today, ten days from default on America's debt and both the Senate and House have shut down and gone home for the weekend.

What scares the bejesus out of me is that even if a bill, any bill that raises the debt ceiling, were to be passed on Tuesday, there might not be time before the 2 August deadline for the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to do the markup to see what it would cost, then have votes in both houses of Congress.

Yesterday, in one of his blog posts, New York Times Op-Ed columnist, Paul Krugman, had this to say:

“I am among those in a state of suppressed rage and panic over the president’s negotiating strategy...

[W]hat evidence do we have that Obama knows what he’s doing?” [emphasis mine]

My rage is not even suppressed and my panic is off the scale. Not only at the president, but all of them. The debt ceiling should have been voted as a matter of course, as it has been when needed for decades, on its own and then deal separately with spending and taxes.

(Do read the rest of Krugman's blog post. I don't disagree with his three-point dissection of Obama's behavior.)

So that this Interesting Stuff isn't a total loss, here are some fun items:

RESCUE OF A HUMPBACK WHALE
Nana Royer sent this video of a group of conservationists who took on a rare opportunity to save one of the creatures with whom we share this planet. Please don't skip it for its length; it is worth every minute.

JUST ONE QUESTION
Peter Tibbles sent this. I use it tentatively, but I laughed loud and long and I'm sure some of you will too.

Nagasaki 1945

Nagasaki 2011

Question: What the fark is that arch made of?

OKAY, ONE MORE PIECE OF POLITICS
This was the cover on The Weekly Standard this week. Well done!

Pols playing poker


Comments

The brilliant Marcy Wheeler describes our President's behavior over the debt ceiling like this: "Obama really was, and is, worried more about his reelection than he is the welfare of the country and the entirety of its citizens who are not members of his cherished moneyed elite and financial sector magnates.' More here.

And after he gives away Medicare and Social Security, we'll still probably have to vote for the guy because the other ones are crazy. But we don't have to pretend we aren't furious.

I would rather have a diet COLA than nothing at all. I know we must make some changes, I just want the pleasure of shared sacrifice really shared. Love your post when you get angry.

My Senator is Mark Warner, one of the gang of six. If we could bring that plan to the floor and pass it things would improve. I trust Mark Warner. He was the best governor Virginia ever had. Now he is our good Senator.

While it is remarkable that those Shinto arches survived amidst such devastation, that second image is not from Nagasaki, which is in southern Japan, far from the area of the earthquake. It is actually the village of Otsuchi. If you look closely, you can see the slight difference in the arches. Interestingly, Shinto shrines represent the connection between the people and the land.
LOVE, love , love the Daily Standard cover!

Oops, Weekly Standard! (That's what I get for being such a smartypants.)

Regarding the Arches - see snopes.com

http://www.snopes.com/photos/architecture/nagasaki.asp

• They have enacted voter ID bills (to prevent fraud, they say) that make it all but impossible for millions of black, Latino and elder citizens to vote. Which is, of course, the real point since those groups lean strongly Democratic and if elders have not in the past, it's a good bet they'll switch parties when they see their Medicare and Social Security cut." I've never understood why requiring ID for voting is discriminatory. We need ID to cash a check, get on an airplane, get senior prices at the movies. Could you please explain this?

Random thoughts and feelings: I assume sincerity and hope all are struggling with what is possible rather than fighting for what is impossible (as much as my progressive heart might want something else).
I worked until I was 70 and would still be working five years later if health allowed, so I could support 67 as the social security/medicare age. But will fight fiercely against any reduction in benefits.
Most people do not distinguish between the lower middle class and the poor. Those of us who live mostly on social security will quickly slip into poverty with any kind of cuts. We will be become medicade clients and be living on the front lawns of Capitals, legislators' homes and public parks.

I have lived too long. To see a great country come to this. We are ruled by knaves and stupid, really stupid, people.

If and when Health Care Reform kicks in, it is possible that people may find it easier to acquire and keep good health coverage (that's the hope). If so, the age of Medicare eligibility may not be an issue.

I do worry about the age of eligibility for SS benefits, however, especially for people who have jobs that involve physical labor (but really for everyone).

Diana Rothberg...
The question is GOVERNMENT ISSUED PHOTO IDs which, currently, about 11 states require and others are considering such legislation.

Most of those accept a valid driver's license, passport, naturalization papers or tribal ID to obtain a ballot.

And therein is the problem.

1. In large cities with decent public transportation, millions do not drive, do not have drivers licenses, especially the poor who cannot afford cars.

2. Elders who have given up driving no longer have valid drivers licenses. Nor do most of the millions in assisted living and nursing homes.

3. Less than 10 percent of Americans hold passports.

4. Millions of students at college are disenfranchised because their drivers licenses are issued in the state where their parents live, not where they are attending school.

The requirement of a government-issued photo ID automatically disenfranchises millions of voters.

Here's a petition that came in this morning that I put on my blog. I think it makes sense.

http://draftberniesanders2012.org/

Ah, politics. Just for the moment, with all of G's headquarters staff fired this week and he still employed, we ran off to see Larry Crowne. The world may be falling apart, but just for this one evening, we made time to laugh.

I'd like to add something to Ronni's reply to Diana re states' disenfranchising voters due to the ID question. I haven't had a car since 2004. I've kept up my driver's license because...well, because I keep thinking things will get better. But the last time it came up for renewal this past April, the fee was $32 here in California. That's a lot to me now, and it gave me pause. I did renew the license, but at the expense of several weeks' worth of decent groceries.

Yes, this systematic disenfranchisement is real, it is effective, and it is evil.

Forgot something...this is for Kay. I joyfully signed the petition to draft Bernie Sanders! What a wonderful idea! If I could afford to move to Vermont (and thought I could survive the winters) I would, in a heartbeat.

Thank you, Kay!

Many states have non-driver photo ids - New York is one.

I appreciate your reply. However, the fact that a person does not drive does not mean they cannot get government issued ID. My husband, a New Yorker, though we live in California, gets a valid ID from the Dept of Motor Vehicles.

I drove my 91 year old mom to the DMV (CA) this past May, when her driver's license expired, to convert her over to a Senior Photo ID. She can no longer drive and lives in an assisted living community. If not for me, her fantastic Designated Daughter (!), she would have no "government issued" ID and no way to get one. It was a real challenge for my mom to go through this process, even with my total support and companionship. She is mentally fine, but physically frail, and the process was such a long, complicated slog. It's so easy to assume that these things are accessible for seniors, when the reality is quite different. Certainly for seniors, there should be some sort of "house call ID service" provided, along with any legislation requiring these ID's, to do something as important as vote.

National identification schemes always give me the shivers. Harks of the Jewish star in WWII. 'Talked with my 44 YO son about the debt cieling, cuts to entitlements, etc. He says no one his age thinks the benefits will be avalable to them when the time comes. Interestingly, he works at a brokerage house and sounds like they have made no contingency plan for what will happen to the markets if the cieling isn't raised. I have nothing intelligent to say about the current political process except that I have never felt so disappointed in my government. What idiots and we elected them!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)