Greedy Old Geezers? Not
Invisible Moments

More Media Muscle Please

category_bug_ageism.gif Mainstream newspaper columnists seem to be having an off week. John Tierney of The New York Times did a lazy job in his column yesterday on Social Security, and Abigail Trafford at the Washington Post was a letdown too, on the same day.

Ms. Trafford is the only columnist at a major U.S. newspaper writing regularly, though not often enough, about aging. Her column this week addresses age stereotyping, using as her jumping-off point the example of a dumb comment by a 20-year-old about older drivers being "soooo slow":

“But what if the ‘they’ in such a quote were African American postal workers? Sooooo slow! Or girls in algebra class? Sooooo slow!

“Instead of chuckles there would be outrage and charges of racism and sexism…

“Lawrence H. Summers, the president of Harvard University, nearly lost his job after he crossed the ‘ism’ line with his insensitive remarks about the scientific ability of women.”

- Washington Post, 14 June 2005

Ms. Trafford then hits – all too briefly – a few highlights of the prevailing American ageism:

“Geezer-bashing is socially acceptable….Chronological diversity is not regarded as part of cultural diversity.

“…the social virus of ageism is endemic. It harms older Americans by unfairly portraying them with negative characteristics and marginalizing them in society…

“Ageism also harms younger people by exacerbating their fears of growing old.”

All important points we’ve been making at TimeGoesBy for more than a year now, but by sandwiching them between several paragraphs of what is a minor, ageist indignity about the driving habits of older people when there are so many serious consequences such as employment and healthcare discrimination, Ms. Trafford diminishes the issue and comes dangerously close to making ageism a joke.

It would be good if Ms. Trafford, in her unique position at a wide-circulation newspaper that gets more attention than this little blog, would assert a bit more muscle on issues of aging than she does in this column.

Comments

John Tierney's OpEd piece in the NYT was almost a self parody. It was so off-base it was almost funny in very sick sort of way. What Tierney was trying to peddle was that the senior members of society, are guilty of endemic laziness for not working until at least 75. The only reason why people over 65 aren't doing the old nine-to-five now is because they're paralyzed or parapalegic (or both) or they are shiftless, lazy, layabouts .
I suggested that many like me would work if anyone would give them a chance at anything besides box-boying at Safeway.
(I wonder how much the White House paid to place Tierney's trash?)

“…the social virus of ageism is endemic. It harms older Americans by unfairly portraying them with negative characteristics and marginalizing them in society…

“Ageism also harms younger people by exacerbating their fears of growing old.”

I'm sorry, but as an old gezzer I have to say that both these sentences relate to real life. I am marinalized and have negative characteristics because I am old. It is the pits, but it is real.

I also tell kids to never get old. It is not worth the waiting around to achieve. Die while you are young doing something daring.

I do agree with most things you say, but not this.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)