Living to a Healthy Old Age
Thursday, 27 October 2005
A new poll from USA Today/ABC News reveals that most respondents believe age 87 is about the right life span. More than two-thirds in the survey worry about losing their health, losing the ability care for themselves and losing their mental capabilities as they get older. But more of us are leading longer, healthier lives than ever before in history.
In 1900, average life expectancy was 47. Today it is about 75 and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that 71,000 Americans are 100 years or older. In just five years, the Bureau projects, 114,000 Americans will reach their centenary and by 2020, 241,000 of us will be 100 or older.
As fearful as most people are of decline in health as they get older, aging does not always translate into disease and debility. Many centenarians are living active, healthful lives. Some are capable of driving safely, caring for themselves at home and working full- or part-time.
Much of our increased longevity and health in old age is due to antibiotics and advances in treating the diseases and conditions of aging, but why some people age well and others don’t is still a mystery, and is the topic of a great deal of scientific study. Some researchers are working on genetics. Others are looking into human growth hormone and there is a fringe element that believes drastic reduction in calorie intake – down to near-starvation level – can increase life span by a third or more.
More stable scientists disagree. Leonard Haylick, a researcher on aging at the University of California, San Francisco says
“…there is a limit to the rise in life expectancy. Humans, he says, simply aren’t built to live for 150 or 200 years. ‘Our body parts, like the parts in an automobile engine, can’t work forever.’”
- - Yahoo News, 24 October 2005
“Anti-aging” is a huge topic on the internet. Google that phrase and you’ll get two-and-a-half million returns most of which are touting expensive creams, potions and pills promising to extend your life by decades or, at minimum, keep you looking age 20 until you’re 100. Better to save your money and heed these men:
“Nothing discovered yet has been shown to stop or slow down aging,” says Robert Butler, president of the International Longevity Center-USA.“’There’s nothing you can take now that will make you live longer,’ says David Finkelstein at the National Institute on Aging’s Biology of Aging program.”
- - Yahoo News, 24 October 2005
As the USA Today/ABC News poll shows, most people are more concerned with health than living forever.
“Younger people fear old age because of a misconception that getting older means a rapid decline in health,” says researcher JaeMi Pennington of the New England Centenarian Study at Boston University.“'That’s not necessarily so', he says. ‘More people today are living longer and healthier lives, and we can attribute that to advances in medical science and better nutrition.’”
- - USA Today, 23 October 2005
Dr. Andrew Weil knows a lot about nutrition. I’d have more respect for him if he didn’t spend so much time touting his own brand of expensive supplements, but his general advice is good and you can find detailed information on health in aging at his and other medical websites. And if you believe you need extra vitamins and other supplements, you can find them more cheaply at your local drug and nutrition stores.
Whether we live to the current average life expectancy of 75 or the survey respondents’ ideal of 87 or reach 100 or more, we can control, to a degree, our health for whatever number of years we have left, and we’ve known how to do that since we were children - because our mothers knew what they were talking about:
- Get plenty of exercise
- Eat your vegetables
- Get enough rest
- Don’t smoke
- Avoid excess alcohol
[Hat tip to Chancy for this story.]
I saw Andrew Weil on Larry King Live the other night. He talked about "rewards to aging" with wisdom as one of them. He has a new book out: "Healthy Aging:A Lifelong Guide to your Physical and Spiritual Well-Being," which sounds good for us wise, aging folks!
Posted by: Tamar | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 06:33 AM
Ronni,
I saw Andrew Weil on Larry King the other night and was very impressed. It is good to know that there are rational people out there that know the potents and gimmicks do not work.
Thank you also for alerting us to the wonderful blog of Joy's. I an enjoying her upbeat posts.
Posted by: Maria | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 06:59 AM
I agree with you about Andrrew Weil's knowledge about nutrition. Saw him the other morning on the Today Show, he gave me a reminder that "butter is better." He is so right. Not only is it better for you healthwise,(is there such a word), it tastes better. I made a scramble the other morning and it was so much better then when I make it with margarine.
On the other hand, I saw surprised and disappointed to see a large ad in the newspaper where a department store was advertising a product that he was promoting, to prevent wrinkles.
Shame on him.
Posted by: Millie Garfield | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 08:33 AM
A few years ago I came across a web site that projected life span, based upon one's responses to an extensive series of questions about lifestyle, current health, eating and drinking habits, etc. I lost the url when I changed computers (backed up docs, but forgot about bookmarks), but it came from a site that seemed pretty reliable (insurance company, medical institution, something like that). It came out that I project to make it to 86, and although I can't count on that, it's what I figure into my planning for the future. I then filled out the questionnaire again, only with one change: instead of my actual weight (normal if I was about a foot taller), and plugged in what I should weigh. The new projected age: 91. So (statistically) I could possibly add 5 years to my life by dieting down to a normal, healthy weight. I was enthusiastic about that at first, but then I thought: are 5 extra years that late in life worth the present sacrifice?
I'll have another doughnut, please.
Oh, BTW, Mom's list of recommendations was adequate for her day, but I would add another for our times: buckle up.
Posted by: Deejay | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 04:35 PM
On your concluding 5 tips to a longer hearlthier life, I score 2 out of 5, or 40%. If life is like baseball, batting .400 is excellent. Too bad it ain't... I suppose it's 75 and out here I come, ready or not...
Posted by: Winston | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 05:48 PM
When I was at the library today, I saw a book staring me in the face and I thought of you :) It's called: 'Age Power: How the 21st Century will be Ruled by the New Old'. (By Ken Dychtwald, PHD; ISBN: 0-87477-954-5)
Here is a quote from page 94:
"Adjusting to the Changing Markers of Age"
The conflicts that will arise when yesterday's markers of aging meet tomorrow's life spans are brand new to the world. As such, they will require new solutions. Some of these have already emerged and are working their bugs out; others have yet to be created. In considering the new markers of aging, we must:
1) Unhinge old age from the obsolete marker of 65 and index entitlements to rising longevity.
2) Let people choose to retire when they are ready and when they can afford to instead of holding everyone to uniform standards.
3) Smash the 'silver ceiling' and make it easier for people to pursue meaningful employment in maturity.
4) Replace the 'linear' life paradigm with a new 'cyclic' one that takes maturity into account as a time of new life pursuits and passions."
Haven't read the book yet, but at first glance, it looked very interesting! BTW, I just opened to any old page and read this quote about an aspect of longevity. I had to smile when I read the title of your post today. Don't you love how life works? :)
Posted by: Gemma Grace | Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 08:43 PM