Crabby Old Lady Requests Your Advice
This Week in Elder News: 27 September 2008

Elders in Political Ads

[EDITORIAL NOTE: If you have written any blog posts on political issues this week, be sure to get links to me by the end of today for the Sunday Election Issues post. If you're wondering what I'm talking about, see this post.]

category_bug_gayandgray.gif All too frequently, our culture keeps elders out of visible participation in media culture. Young and beautiful rules.

But I realized recently there's a surprising exception to this norm: a particular genre of political ads. Take, for example, this ad from the No on Prop. 8 campaign which is fighting the initiative to eliminate California's constitutional right for same-sex couples to marry.

An attractive older heterosexual married couple plead directly with the viewers: "don't eliminate marriage for anyone," including their gay daughter. I think it is probably pretty effective. What do you think?

This ad is not unique in showcasing elders speaking to values. A story: in 2003 I had the privilege of working on part of the campaign to defeat California Proposition 54. This was a deceptive measure that would have prevented the state from collecting racial demographic information about people who used state programs. Proponents sold it as encouraging "color blindness." A coalition of civil rights advocates worked to defeat it because we feared its consequences: if no demographic data could be collected, it would become impossible to discover if very different populations were getting a fair shake.

In the 1990s, California had an unhappy history of voting for propositions like this. We were experiencing rapid racial diversification and many people weren't entirely comfortable with that, so we were susceptible to appeals to sweep racial classifications under a rug. But on this one, opponents pulled out a sweeping 64 percent victory.

How? We figured out that both the majority white electorate and the emerging communities of color would respond to the same pitch. The message was "by voting on this you'll make a life-and-death decision affecting every Californian. Proposition 54 would block information that can help save lives. It's bad medicine."

KoopWe had funds for just one TV ad to deliver that message. So we tested three sets of messengers. One was an attractive middle-aged female nurse. When opinion researchers measure who is trusted by the most people, nurses always rank very highly. We also had available to us many members of the cast of the show ER - then TV's most watched medical drama. So we tried out having them deliver the lines. Finally we tested Dr. C. Everett Koop, the retired Surgeon General of the United States and internet medical entrepreneur. If ever there was an archetypal grandfather, Koop fit the bill. I may not like him much, but I don't deny that.

Our focus groups found Koop by far the most believable messenger, so up he went and we blanketed the state with our ad. (Sadly, this was before YouTube, so I can't show you.) And we won, pretty much everywhere.

So why are visible elders so effective in some political ads? I have some theories.

Obviously, good political ads need to be attractive to elders because we vote much more reliably than other age groups. So it is not surprising that ad creators would show us some of our own.

But also, in a limited way, elders do bring a special authority to some elections that are really contests between conflicting visions of society's values. Most people, at least for the few minutes during which they cast their ballots, bring to elections a kind of civic communal consciousness that may be largely absent from most of our lives. If we vote, we do it in a mood of slightly solemn seriousness. (We often do this with jury duty as well I think.) And elders, despite our youth-oriented culture, bring a certain experiential authority that meshes well with that momentary communal consciousness.

And so, when campaigns are trying to urge people to come together about something that makes them anxious, elders make good spokespeople. And we elders get to see ourselves on TV in those moments.

Here's another specimen of Koop doing his grandfatherly curmudgeon bit for another campaign. Prop. 86 would have socked smokers with a cigarette tax, using the proceeds for health services. Koop couldn't beat the tobacco money that fought that one, but he gave it a good try.

[At The Elder Storytelling Place today, David Wolfe explains how he found a novel remedy for a malady that afflicts so many, titled Oh, My Aching Back.]


It's comforting to see that elders are influential after all. I just finished visiting my family hoping to have them look to me as the matriarch dispensing the wisdom of my advanced years.

Suffice it to say, it didn't happen and I was disappointed.

It's curious how elders are ignored and kept out of almost every other kind of tv and print ads, but suddenly are valued for their experience and wisdom on political ads.

Perhaps it's because Madison Avenue is not so heavily involved in their creation. Perhaps it's the calculated and cynical attempt to woo elders, a huge voting bloc.

Whatever, it is a welcome change from the usual fare.

I loved the Prop 8 ad. It makes such an impact to see heterosexuals coming out (so to speak) in favor of gay/lesbian rights! The fact that they are 'older' makes the ad even more effective.

I ran into this amazingly tasteless video by Sarah Silverman today. "What? Sarah Silverman? Tasteless?" you're asking yourself. Well, yes. Before you click through, please be aware that it's R rated and probably not safe for work.
The Great Schlep

I thought it was REALLY funny. I have children who might want to indulge in this kind of emotional blackmail, and my dad is still alive and I can imagine pulling it on him too. But I think it's worth viewing by all of us older folks just because it's funny!

Frank - that's fall-down funny. Can't tell you how much I need a laugh today and now I can't stop laughing. LOVE it.

Everyone else - do take Frank's R-rated warning seriously, but come on - at our ages, how many times have we heard these words. It won't hurt.

I'm glad elders can be influential in political ads, but share the questioning as to why they don't seem to be valued in much other advertising?

Thinking about my considerations when I vote in Calif., I tend to question how groups determine the impact their ads have or don't have?

I think this is a good ad and I certainly hope it positively impacts many voters including some who live in my community. Regrettably, my long supportive view on this and other such equal rights issues has resulted in a certain degree of distancing from me by some I've known a long time who think otherwise.

I recall reading about this educational venture and hadn't realized it was such an issue with that age group in Fla.
I had a few laughs with FP's video and was able to tolerate "those words." They haven't stuck in my brain, nor do I fear they'll involuntarily roll off the tip of my tongue when I least expect them to do so. She's funny!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)