ELDER MUSIC: Story Songs
REFLECTIONS: Socialism

Xtreme Compensation, Xtreme Rage

UPDATE: There is an interesting analysis of this AIG story from Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo.]

category_bug_politics.gif Although I start every day with the online newspapers, I look forward to Sundays for the couple of hours, often more, of leisurely immersion in the mix of news and expanded weekend features that has been my ritual for half a century.

As usual yesterday morning, I brushed my teeth, fed the cat, made the coffee and settled down at my computer. Also as usual, I started with The New York Times. What was not usual is that when I saw the headline of the lead story, AIG Planning Huge Bonuses After $170 Billion Bailout, I nearly spit my coffee onto my pristine new laptop. You could say I was spitting mad.

It was only 6AM eastern time, but the number of comments at the end of the story had already reached 528, all of them some variation on what David Weidler of New Orleans wrote:

“This is criminal. Instead of being fired for there incompetence they are being rewarded. How can Congress allow this to happen?”

Indeed. It's good to know I'm not alone in my anger.

I skipped over to The Washington Post where it was also a front-page story: Bailout King AIG Still to Pay Millions in Bonuses. The number of comments of the same stripe had already passed 600.

So much for my pleasurable Sunday morning ritual.

After the brouhaha over CEOs traveling to Washington by private jet to beg for billions, and the widespread disgust at multi-million-dollar bonuses for those same CEOs and their corporate sidekicks, and the president's public chats on our troubles and our responsibilities, Little Miss Sunshine here had thought bonuses might be finished. How could I have been, even briefly, so delusional? Where did my instinctual cynicism go?

Not to worry. It returned full force Sunday morning and I am enraged.

The federal government has given AIG $170 billion in bailout money in exchange for 80 percent ownership of the giant insurance company. AIG planned to pay out $165 million in bonuses by yesterday which, according to The New York Times, is in addition to $121 million previously paid. And, this bonus money is going to "the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.”

That would be the financial services division, the one that wrote trillions of dollars of credit default swaps backed by sub-prime mortgages.

Edward M. Liddy, the new AIG chairman appointed by Treasury secretary Henry Paulson to run the company wrote in a letter last month:

“These employees [receiving bonuses] are highly specialized and/or are part of businesses that control billions of dollars of revenue and value that will be needed to repay the U.S. taxpayer. Our competitors understand how valuable our top executives are, and we are acutely aware that they would like to siphon off our most talented leaders.”
- The Washington Post, 15 March 2008

In addition to that “best and brightest” argument for bonuses from bailout funds, both the companies and the federal government say that the bonuses are binding legal contracts:

“...in his letter to Mr. Geitner, Mr. Liddy wrote that he had shown the details of the $450 million bonus pool to outside lawyers and had been told that AIG had no choice but to follow through with the payment schedule.

“The administration official said the Treasury Department did its own legal analysis and concluded that those contracts could not be broken.”
- The New York Times, 15 March 2009

Horse pucky. Corporations break contracts every day, especially those with their employees. In a brilliantly clear explanation of how debt destroyed our economy, attorney Thomas Geoghegan, writing in the April issue of Harper's (not yet online), says:

“First, we removed the possibility of creating real, binding contracts by allowing employers to bust the unions that had been entering into these agreements for millions of people. Second, we allowed those same employers to cancel existing contracts, virtually at will, by transferring liability from one corporate shell to another, or letting a subsidiary go into Chapter 11 and then moving to 'cancel' the contract rights, including lifetime health benefits and pensions.”

People who destroy a company are not “talented” and they are not “valuable” as Mr. Liddy and other CEOs continue to insist in the bonus controversy. They are criminally incompetent. They have brought our country (and other countries) to its financial knees, destroying the life savings of millions of people. In addition to the retirement savings and college funds of those in mid-life that are gone, there are elders who will live in penury for the rest of their lives due to the greed and incompetence of the people in these companies.

Here's a rueful laugh to go with my rage – the definition of bonus at entrepreneur.com:

“A monetary payment made to an employee over and above their standard salary or compensation package. Bonuses are one of the ways employers reward their employees for a job well done.” [emphasis added]

Someone has got to pay for the destruction of trillions of dollars of ordinary Americans' (mostly modest) wealth if for no other reasons than appearances and to assuage the fury of people who not so long ago had jobs and savings and now stand helpless in unemployment lines and live crammed in with relatives while business executives who caused this crisis are allowed to continue in their jobs still raking in millions for “a job well done” in addition to their astronomical salaries.

It was shocking, but also gratifying, to see how many hundreds of people, so early in the morning, had already expressed their rage in comments at The New York Times, The Washington Post and other newspapers around the country. If these executives are not going to be fired or prosecuted, at least the bonuses must stop.

A government that can figure out a “legal” way to deprive workers of their right to organize and their earned pensions can certainly figure out how to strip executives of their unearned bonuses. Rage, rage against this crime to President Obama and your representatives. You know how.

[At The Elder Storytelling Place today, Norm Jenson has a puzzle for you in his story, The Jumble.]


Comments

Your rage mirrored mine exactly when I read the NYT article yesterday. What are these people thinking? Is there no way force those responsible for our current mess to own up to their greed and folly? Giving them outrageous bonuses absolutely isn't the answer. This is all so unconscionable.

Standing at the gates of shame with hands outstretched ... they may have their bonuses, in return I want their heads!

"How could I have been, even briefly, so delusional? Where did my instinctual cynicism go?"


The same place mine did and many others, obviously. I think it is sinful and it is obscenity to allow this to happen. The gov. could step in, but they should have made it a condition of the bailout money.

According to the news from Reuters this morning, it gets worse...

http://tinyurl.com/dabaeg

Apparently AIG was funneling the bailout money to other banks, including European banks.

Thank you for further enlightening us on the criminal incompetence featured in your comprehensive reporting.

There is a simple psychological axiom that says, "Don't reward bad behavior." But I suppose those at the "top" have thinking processes that operate at a much more complex level.

Wouldn't it be refreshing if people of substance (and scruples) were allowed to take over some of these "leadership" rolls? What have they got to lose? They've already demonstrated their inability to do so. Or does one need to be a member of the "club."

The “mindset” of many of those addressing our economic situation with regard to Wall Street and in particular, AIG, seems to be pretty much this….

The ones that for the most part got us into this financial fiasco are considered the brightest of the brightest and only their skills could have gotten us into this mess. Consequently, it will take these same people and those same skills to get us out. And their coconspirators claim that they must be paid for those skills or they may refuse to help - leaving us to flounder for years to come. This is paramount to nothing less than blackmail and….. we are apparently going to pay it.

Besides the Times, my inbox had an email from Jane Hamsher at the political blog, Firedoglake. We can join their petition, already signed by 10,000 equally enraged Americans. Tell Congress to demand more banking accountability by signing on HERE http://action.firedoglake.com/page/s/Transparency.

I am appalled!!!! We ordinary mortals are struggling and these idiots are getting BONUSES for losing money? Greed is one of the Seven Deadly Sins and while I'm sure God will punish them, I think we need to punish them NOW.


My husband and I had both an Insurance Policy and an annuity at AIG.

Their actions have made us lose all confidence in their company and we have cancelled both of these and have gotten our money out of there before the bonuses wiped it all out.

That money is now safely in the SERTA POSTURPEDIC BANK & TRUST CO. where it will stay until the government comes to its senses and forces these scoundrels to stop their greedy practices and begin doing business in a honest way....

Greed is their religion

Oh Ronni, what can I say except, You said it all!

The incompetence of the government in not putting restrictions on these loans is obscene.

I am sickened by the power brokers and what they are doing to this country.

If AIG went belly up with out the infusion from the Fed they would not receive bonuses or salaries. They should be grateful to still have a job and not expect under these extraordinary times to get a bonus for failing in their fiscal responsibilities.

I agree Ronni the union busting government can bust executives contracts as well.

I find it unbelievable that, after all that we have been through - all that millions of Americans have been through and are going through daily - that we would take this opportunity to restructure and redefine prosperity in this country and throw it all out on this! I think people want to build a new and stable economy and that cannot be done on the backs of the victims of this economic disaster by incorporating these well groomed and self serving thieves into the plan. I'm neither economic pundit nor carpenter but I know a bit about foundations and structural integrity...this is portends more unhappiness for this country.

My experiences in business and politics have have led me to always live with the following axiom in mind: "Just like in a cesspool, the biggest chunks always rise to the top!" Unfortunately, events continue to prove me right.

Infuriating arrogance of these people stealing us blind is beyond belief!

I'm catching up with your posts here after being away from blogging a while, and so many comments I could make after reading earlier TGBs. Have made a few tech changes during this time, too.

This kind of thing is happening because of the blind fear that has inculcated into the American people for all time: SOCIALISM!

When GM was asking for $18 billion in loans (the first round), the company's market capitalization was $3 billion. Today, AIG's market capitalization is $2.5 billion (up from less than $1 billion a week ago). US taxpayers are spending far more to bail companies out than it would cost to buy controlling interest in the same companies and use that control to FIRE MANAGEMENT. But - HORRORS(!) - that would be SOCIALISM!

Why should the taxpayers assume responsibility for these companies' failures with assume the power to fire the management that caused the failures?

This kind of thing is happening because of the blind fear that has inculcated into the American people for all time: SOCIALISM!

When GM was asking for $18 billion in loans (the first round), the company's market capitalization was $3 billion. Today, AIG's market capitalization is $2.5 billion (up from less than $1 billion a week ago). US taxpayers are spending far more to bail companies out than it would cost to buy controlling interest in the same companies and use that control to FIRE MANAGEMENT. But - HORRORS(!) - that would be SOCIALISM!

Why should the taxpayers assume responsibility for these companies' failures without assuming the power to fire the management that caused the failures and continue to loot them for more spoils?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)