A Holiday Art Tour
More Elder Weight Control

The Elder Vote

category_bug_politics.gif Voting is the only political act that most Americans involve themselves with. U.S. turnout for elections is lower than almost all other western democracies. Elders vote in larger numbers relative to their population than all other age groups.

That should give elders an outsized influence in elections; if we voted as a bloc, our voice would be thunderous. As it is, that voice is muted because many elders vote against their own and, therefore, all elders' best interests.

They are the ones who, in the tea party's infancy, shouted the oxymoron, “Keep your government hands off my Medicare.” They are the ones who support calls for “shared sacrifice” which, translated from the deceptive, means more taxes on the middle class and the poor while exempting the rich.

They are ones who support “entitlement reform” which means cut – or better yet, eliminate - Social Security and Medicare.

And even though it takes older workers twice as long to find employment as younger ones, they are the elders who support tax cuts for “corporate jobs creators” which means no jobs.

Have you seen any new jobs from corporations in the past three years as their profits have soared? No, you have not and since they weasel out of their taxes anyway, reducing the corporate tax rate will not, nor is it intended to, produce new jobs.

A newly published dissection of our nation's current political predicament is a compelling and brutal diatribe that spares no one – not Democrats, President Obama, the religious right nor the loonies and especially not the Republican Party. Some excerpts:

“Both parties are rotten...But both parties are not rotten in quite the same way. The Democrats have their share of machine politicians, careerists, corporate bagmen, egomaniacs and kooks. Nothing, however, quite matches the modern GOP.”
“The GOP cares solely and exclusively about its rich contributors. The party has built a whole catechism on the protection and further enrichment of America's plutocracy. Their caterwauling about deficit and debt is so much eyewash to con the public.”
“It should have been evident to clear-eyed observers that the Republican Party is becoming less and less like a traditional political party in a representative democracy and becoming more like an apocalyptic cult, or one of the intensely ideological authoritarian parties of 20th century Europe. This trend has several implications, none of them pleasant.”
“...when a program is too popular to attack directly, like Medicare or Social Security, they prefer to undermine it by feigning an agonized concern about the deficit. That concern, as we shall see, is largely fictitious.”
“Republicans' myths about taxation have been internalized by millions of economically downscale 'values voters,' who may have been attracted to the GOP for other reasons (which I will explain later), but who now accept this misinformation as dogma.”
“Pandering to fundamentalism is a full-time vocation in the GOP. Beginning in the 1970s, religious cranks ceased simply to be a minor public nuisance in this country and grew into the major element of the Republican rank and file.”

You may think that has all been written by a Progressive or, at least a Democrat. You would be wrong. Mike Lofgren is a highly-esteemed, 30-year Congressional staffer expert in the areas of budget, defense and security who has worked mainly for Republicans.

The title of his piece says it all: Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult and with it, Lofgren just made himself the Wendell Potter of politics. Fed up, he retired in June:

“It is this broad and ever-widening gulf between the traditional Republicanism of an Eisenhower and the quasi-totalitarian cult of a Michele Bachmann that impelled my departure from Capitol Hill...

“I left because I was appalled at the headlong rush of Republicans, like Gadarene swine, to embrace policies that are deeply damaging to this country's future; and contemptuous of the feckless, craven incompetence of Democrats in their half-hearted attempts to stop them.

“And, in truth, I left as an act of rational self-interest. Having gutted private-sector pensions and health benefits as a result of their embrace of outsourcing, union busting and 'shareholder value,' the GOP now thinks it is only fair that public-sector workers give up their pensions and benefits, too.

“Hence the intensification of the GOP's decades-long campaign of scorn against government workers. Under the circumstances, it is simply safer to be a current retiree rather than a prospective one.”

Which gets us back to the elder vote. One of the successful Republican tactics of the past 40 years of their march to a permanent Republican government is repetition. Repeat any lie enough and it becomes fact to those Lofgren refers to as “low-information voters.”

The rest of us – in our conversations with others, our blogs, comments at other blogs, letters to editors, etc. - need to do everything in our power to convince low-information voters of the Republican agenda. Such as this from Lofgren:

“If you think Paul Ryan and his Ayn Rand-worshipping colleagues aren't after your Social Security and Medicare, I am here to disabuse you of your naiveté. They will move heaven and earth to force through tax cuts that will so starve the government of revenue that they will be 'forced' to make 'hard choices' - and that doesn't mean repealing those very same tax cuts, it means cutting the benefits for which you worked.”

I know it doesn't sound like much to keep up our side's drumbeat, but it is a start. More, we can begin now to support candidates for Congress who are not the lunatics vying for the Republican nomination for president.

The eventual Republican nominee will be bankrolled by unlimited funds from unknown donors whose names we may not know, but we can be certain they support corporations' best interests against the people's.

So we must seek out and help sane Congressional candidates defeat those of the Republican cult – people like Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont who is unequivocal in his fight to maintain Social Security and is up for re-election next year. If you have a few extra dollars, you might throw some Bernie's way.

Don't think that elders' interests are selfish interests. There is not a single elder issue that does not benefit younger people – if not now, later in their lives. It is crucial to future elder generations that we do our part to keep Social Security and Medicare, among other programs, safe for them. If we can enlist more elders to believe this, our voice will be heard.

Also, I urge you to read Mike Lofgren's entire piece – it is the most compelling, honest political commentary I've read in years and it – correctly, in my mind – identifies the dysfunction in government that could destroy our way of life.

At The Elder Storytelling Place today, Clair Jean: I Can See Clearly Now


Because I have grandchildren, I am not a single issue voter. I am concerned about jobs for young people and the future of our environment, a lot of things.

BUT I became a voter only for Democrats thanks to the turn of the Republican party to the extreme right. I think that what they do to the weakest, which does include old folks, is not good for anybody. It has to be a whole package and for them, it's not. Their turn against the middle class by growing the wealth of the richest so they can get more donations to run campaigns has totally turned me off on them and I wish it was otherwise as I used to vote for the man. I have seen evidence in the last few years that the Republican party controls the vote of their people and the so-called moderates only vote that way when their votes are not needed. They are in lockstep and probably couldn't get elected if they were not.

Personally, I hate being a single party voter but it will stay that way until I see change in the Republican party. Something I sure do not see today. I also though don't want to vote for a Democrat who doesn't have progressive principles and I hope that people in states where that is the case will look for competition in the primaries. The party establishment often supports the party even when the politician is voting for the opposite set of values. We the people need to pay attention to their votes, not just their party registration.

I read Lofgren's piece and had intended to use it on my blog. I am so glad you beat me to it, because you have more readers and will attract more attention.

I am going to e-mail Lofren's entire piece to a Republican friend of mine who stubbornly remains a staunch Republican and votes for the party. I hope to wake him up.

We just have to keep spreading the word every chance we get. Thanks for your advocacy, Ronni.

Rain and Darlene, you are both so right.

And Ronni, you certainly hit the nail this time!

So glad to learn about Mike Lofgren's piece. I will certainly be sharing that one with everyone I know -- especially my dear friend who has a died-in-the-wool Republican brother she can send this to.

Keep up the great work, Ronni, I depend on your blog to give me real food for thought every morning.

Ooops -- I think it should be "dyed-in-the-wool" above.

Of course, both might be accurate in his case!

I can't say it better than Rain and Darlene did and won't even bother to try. I'm planning to do everything I can to help drive back the evil that is permeating our country and urge others to join me. This is a fight for future generations and will be our legacy to them.

It's so important to read the truth, and many kudos to Ronni for spreading it! You and The Daily Show help us keep some sanity in all this madness. Will fwd far and wide. Thanks!!

New theory: Voting leads to longevity.

Last night I watched Mit Romney brag about his lack of experience in government, in order to distance himself from his up and coming opponent who has more than 27 years in government and never lost an election. This morning I thought about it - perhaps my mind went over the issue while I was sleeping. And what we came up with is that, we can't elect a president (anymore) who lacks governmental experience. We learned a bitter lesson from the current incumbent. Much as I despise the "principles" that Rick Perry claims he stands for (obviously he's without any principles)
He's got more than a quarter of a century in the trenches under his belt and the only candidate who has a prayer of breaking the log jam on the Potomac is a real pro.
FDR was a pro and so was LBJ but for the most part we've elected greenhorns who don't learn the ropes until their first term is over.
Now more than ever, we just don't have that much time, it's almost all run out.
So if the elders are going to vote as a block, let's elect a pro. The White House is no place for greenhorns.

Leave it to the Republicans to humanize corporations and dehumanize people.

A phenomenally important piece that needs posting and re-posting.

I totally agree with this post. I know I need to stay involved in politics--and above all vote--despite the fact that I'm disgusted through and through. Big money and special interests control politics and politicians. Maybe millions of people donating small amounts helps re-elect candidates who are at least somewhat aligned with progressive values, but I'm no longer as confident as I was in 2008.

I am constantly solicited by email, phone and snailmail for what little money I have, and I'm thoroughly disgusted with that, too. I dread opening my email. I am seriously considering setting up a new email account to avoid the onslaught of solicitations that will only get worse as elections approach.

Cause #1 for me would be to stop corporations and the superrich from buying politicians by enacting and enforcing REAL election finance reform. Then maybe the rest of us would have a chance. Unfortunately, I don't expect I'll live to see that happen, so somehow I'll have to slog through the next election, contribute what I can and hope that in the end the playing field will somehow level out.

Excellent piece! The real challenge is to be able to engage those voters whose support is needed. In my experience hard-nosed attacking confrontations with belittling rhetoric and name-calling does not predispose individuals to a desired point of view -- even if the arguments are logical.

I know of too many people who are willing to allow others to do their thinking for them i.e. a woman who seems to pride herself in the fact she doesn't keep up with what's happening, instead depending on her husband to tell her how to vote.

So, IMHO, the issue is getting people to seriously listen to facts contrary to what they believe.

As for the Republican Party -- they simply do not practice what they preach. That political Party long years ago moved away from core values -- too many of their followers do not grasp that fact.

History reveals political parties in our country have changed, quite drastically at times so this is nothing new. It's just truly disastrous at this time.

In the world economy we have now, I think the extremely wealthy and too many corporations are fearful of losing their importance/value and are dedicated to getting all they can get, at any cost to ensure their survival and all the rest of us don't matter in the scheme of their big picture.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)