Social Security COLA Increase: 1.5% - Whoopdedoo!
Friday, 01 November 2013
On Wednesday, it was announced that the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for 2014 will be 1.5 percent. With the average benefit at around $14,000 per year, that means about $19 more per month for the average elder.
Don't spend it all in one place.
The small good news (gee, thanks) is that the Medicare Part B premium which is deducted from Social Security checks, will remain the same for most elders at $104.90 per month. There have been years in the past when the increase in that premium was larger than the COLA for the year.
Let me repeat that 2014 increase: 1.5 percent. Just this week I was notified that the premium for my Medicare Supplemental (Medigap) policy is increasing by 7.74 percent. Increases in other fixed expenses for next year will soon be forthcoming although I don't yet know hard numbers.
As Huffpost helpfully explains,
”By law, the cost-of-living adjustment is based on the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers...
“The COLA is calculated by comparing consumer prices in July, August and September each year to prices in the same three months from the previous year. If prices go up over the course of the year, benefits go up.”
Unfortunately for old people, the urban price index undercounts or does not measure the different kinds of expenses people who are retired have resulting in a gradual erosion of Social Security income such as I am experiencing (again) this year - and I'm pretty sure that's happening to many of you too.
Nevertheless, President Barack Obama, many Congressional Republicans and some Democratic legislators want to change the COLA calculation to a measurement of inflation called chained CPI that further reduces the annual COLA.
Here is Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont writing this week at TalkingPointsMemo and at his Senate website:
”Believe it or not, the 'chained CPI' is based on the theory that COLAs are 'too generous' - despite the fact that, in recent years, COLAs have been negligible or even non-existent...
“Further, not only would enacting a chained-CPI be harmful to senior citizens, it would also make substantial cuts to the VA benefits of more than 3.2 million veterans.
“Veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would have their benefits reduced by $1,425 at age 45, $2,341 at age 55 and $3,231 at age 65.”
As you know, the Congressional agreement that stopped the government shutdown after 16 days funds the federal government only until 15 January 2014.
Senator Sanders has been appointed to a 29-member Congressional conference committee (seven senators, 22 representatives) tasked with coming up with a budget to prevent another shutdown in January.
That committee met for the first time earlier this week and their deadline for a budget is 13 December. It is not unlikely that chained CPI will become a pawn in these negotiations.
The committee is chaired by Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, [D-WA], and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, [R-WI]. Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal published a guide to the eight committee members to watch most closely during their negotiations and had this to say about Sanders' role on the committee:
”An independent caucusing with Democrats, he’s been very critical of White House proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare benefits. If liberals want a squeaky wheel on the conference committee, Mr. Sanders can play that role.
“He could provide cover for Democrats if they don’t want to negotiate, but he won’t look the other way if he feels like Democrats are giving anything away to the GOP.”
Personally, I don't have much hope for the committee; historically, little has ever come out of any bipartisan Congressional committee and this one has just six weeks to perform.
Maybe the most we can expect is that Senator Sanders, who is the number one D.C. legislator reliably committed to representing elder issues, can hold the line for us against chained CPI. Here he is speaking earlier this week at a conference on Social Security:
How about taking a couple of minutes to tell Senator Sanders that you support and appreciate his hard work for elders. You can do that here.
At The Elder Storytelling Place today, U.R. Israel: The Atom Bomb Club
Yep, I'd already noticed that the increases in my Medicare premium and co-pays are more than double the tiny little Social Security increase.
Posted by: PiedType | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 07:47 AM
Thanks for the link to Mr. Sanders' Web site. I just wrote him one of the few Fan Letters that I have ever written to anyone. He's my hero.
You gotta love those Vermonters. They are as tough and ornery as they land in which they live!!
Posted by: Miki Davis | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 07:52 AM
I just wrote Senator Sanders a thank you letter in which I pointed out that the COLA for 2014 is not an increase, but a cut. It doesn't begin to reflect the rising cost of our expenses, including the increase in Medicare premiums Pied Type mentioned.
My HMO has not raised the basic benefits, but will no longer include dental insurance (no small amount as teeth and gums deteriorate) and the cost of ER or hospitalization have increased significantly.
Posted by: Darlene | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 08:12 AM
My Medicare Advantage Plan premium is going from $45 to $55, but I'm not complaining because it's a great plan. There is also still a $0 premium plan.
Posted by: Joyce | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 08:14 AM
There are a lot of little old ladies who live on their social security checks. Many of them barely make it. Decisions made with little thought by men who are multi-millionaires have resounding impact.
Think of:
An old lady who can no longer afford to buy bird seed for her beloved songbirds.
An old lady who can no longer send her great-grandchildren their birthday card with $5 bill.
An old lady who has to cancel her newspaper subscription (held for 45 years) because she can't afford it anymore.
These are examples I know personally about and they have caused sadness to very nice old people who don't have that many pleasures left.
Posted by: Scotty | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 08:32 AM
Scotty is so right. I will write a fan note to Senator Sanders. Housing, food, and meds make up the bulk of my expenses these days. And my car, and we all know those increases are not 1.5%. I won't be giving it back though.
Posted by: Celia | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 09:05 AM
The minimum wage in say New York is $7.25 and hasn't increased in 4 years. Nobody ever says a word about the fact that the lowest page workers get miniscule wages that aren't tied to inflation. I'm sure they would have loved to have had the same increases as the SS folks received for the last four years.
Posted by: Vera | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 01:05 PM
I know this won't happen, but wouldn't it be better if the COLA, no matter what it's based on, were a flat, across-the-board bump based on the current full-retirement max benefit? My benefit, for example, is based on forced retirement at 62. My COLA amounts to $19/month. The COLA for a full-retirement max benefit is $37/month. Am I wrong, or is that regressive -- a larger COLA for a wealthier individual?
Yes, I am a socialist.
Posted by: Lee | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 02:16 PM
i wish i could click LIKE on so many of these comments.
Posted by: jeneane | Friday, 01 November 2013 at 07:38 PM